admin

Apprentice star quits show after being accused of using racist language during task and telling Lord Sugar ‘I’m leaving’

A FAVOURITE to win BBC’s The Apprentice has quit after he was accused of using racist language.

Cosmetic dentist Dr Jana Denzel is understood to have used the highly offensive term “coloured” to describe a black person during a task.

A man in a suit stands in front of a London cityscape at sunset.
Dr Jana Denzel, a favourite to win The Apprentice, has quit the show after a race row over offensive language
PA
Lord Alan Sugar in a suit against a London skyline.
Boardroom boss Lord Sugar is said to be shocked by the star’s decision to quit the hit show
BBC/Naked/Ray Burmiston/Rufina Breskin

The incident was reported to show bosses who made him do diversity training immediately after filming.

Next day Dr Denzel told Lord Sugar: “I’m leaving.” The BBC says his exit was unrelated to the dressing down.

The cosmetic dentist, whose clients include A-list stars, told Lord Sugar in the show’s famous boardroom he was “leaving the process” and didn’t feel a “good fit”.

He had been part of a team creating a character for a marketing campaign when he is understood to have used the term “coloured” for a black person.

The highly-offensive term shocked two female candidates and was flagged to show bosses.

All 18 candidates had been given strong warnings about sensitive language during an earlier task which also involved skin colour.

 Dr Denzel, who has spoken of his pride at his Sri Lankan heritage and refugee parents, sat in on discussions with producers to make sure he understood the offensive nature of the remark. The next day he quit

Viewers will not be told about his “ill-informed comment” but his exit will air at the end of Episode Five in two weeks.

A source told The Sun: “The team had been discussing what the character should look like, and there were suggestions from some members to make sure the character was inclusive.

“It was then that Jana made the “coloured comment”, which particularly upset two female candidates on his team.

“The team were particularly shocked because, coming from a minority background himself, they did not expect Jana to use such offensive language to describe their marketing campaign.

 “While his co-stars did push back and made it clear to Jana the comment was unacceptable, it was then escalated further when it was flagged to the production team, who pulled Jana aside.”

It was made clear that candidates who were affected were offered support behind the scenes.

Dr Jana’s show profile says he has built a leading dentistry practice in London’s prestigious Harley Street, with clientele ranging from Hollywood stars to Grammy Award-winning musicians.

Lord Sugar shocked

He grew up in Watford after his parents fled Sri Lanka’s civil war and had been a favourite to win given his business background and three degrees.

An “expert in smile makeovers” he was hoping The Apprentice’s first prize of £250,000 investment from billionaire Lord Sugar, 77, would help him grow his business globally.

His decision to throw in the towel shocked Lord Sugar and his business associates on the show Karren Brady and Tim Campbell.

Dr Jana also avoided any chance of being fired in the boardroom meeting to discuss the results of the task.

Ahead of Week Two’s task — which saw the candidates instructed to make an AI popstar — they were sat down to discuss the importance of using sensitive language.

This was in line with the show’s normal duty of care in case of discussions about skin colour and heritage.

Last night a show spokesperson claimed his departure was unconnected from the earlier incident.

They said: “Jana withdrew from the process for completely unrelated and separate reasons, and he has our full support.”

Discussing the alleged racial slur they added: “We were made aware of an ill-informed comment.

“As soon as it was flagged, we took swift and comprehensive action to address the issue.

Nine Apprentice candidates in a boardroom.
Cosmetic dentist Dr Jana Denzel, far right back row, is understood to have used the highly offensive term ‘coloured’ to describe a black person during a task
BBC

“Whilst we have made it very clear to Jana that his use of language was not acceptable, we are confident there was no ill-intent behind it. The concerns of all parties involved have been addressed and resolved.”

Producers were said to be behind Dr Denzel’s decision to leave. He declined to comment last night.

In recent series The Apprentice has upped the ante with behind-the-scenes training on topics including the use of racially inclusive language after a series of scandals.

Zero tolerance policy

In 2023, Shazia Hussain exclusively told The Sun that she had been racially bullied on the series, and made three complaints to the BBC, who she slammed as having “let her down”.

The Yorkshire businesswoman revealed: “I feel I was verbally abused by some candidates. They (the BBC) brought in a diversity specialist to talk to everyone, but I feel nothing changed. The teams were also rearranged, but I feel the bullying continued.”

At the time, a representative of The Apprentice stressed they had “a zero tolerance policy on any kind of bullying or threatening behaviour, and would take “all complaints seriously”.

Last year candidate and former NHS doctor Dr Asif Munaf was pulled from the show amid a backlash over anti-Semitic remarks and derogatory comments about women he had made online.

A handful of contestants have withdrawn voluntarily since 2005.

 Adele Lock quit the first series after losing four tasks.

In 2006’s series three outspoken Katie Hopkins, who had made several barbs at contestants, rejected Sugar’s offer of a place in the final citing problems regarding childcare provision.

Dr. Jana Denzel in a dental office.
The cosmetic dentist counts A-list stars as clients
Supplied
Candidates on The Apprentice listening to Lord Sugar.
BBC
Dr Jana and the other candidates with Lord Sugar at the show house[/caption]
The Apprentice Series 19 cast photo.
Series 19 of The Apprentice kicked off on January 30, 2025
BBC

In 2010 Raleigh Addington exited the show after finding out his soldier brother had been badly injured on tour in Afghanistan.

Scott Saunders waved goodbye to the series in 2015 after an alleged row with Lord Sugar.

In 2016 Aleksandra King stepped back after telling her teammates she was finding the experience “overwhelming, stressful and really intense”.

Shama Amin announced she’d quit three weeks into the show in 2022 due to the pain she experienced with rheumatoid arthritis.

In 2023, bridal boutique owner Shannon Martin left the boardroom amid “doubts” that the show, or Lord Sugar, would boost her business. In the same year, Reece Donnelly left due to health reasons.

  • The Apprentice continues at 9pm on BBC One next Thursday.
Portrait of Shazia Hussain in a green dress against a London cityscape.
BBC
In 2023, Shazia Hussain, above, exclusively told The Sun that she had been racially bullied on the series[/caption]
Portrait of Dr. Asif Munaf, a contestant on The Apprentice, in a suit against a London skyline.
PA
Last year former NHS doctor Dr Asif Munaf was pulled from the show amid a backlash over anti-Semitic remarks and comments he’d made about women online[/caption]

CARLO SALTY WITH SUGAR

THE Apprentice’s latest fired candidate Carlo Brancati, above left, has taken a swipe at Lord Sugar following his exit from the show — saying contestants do not get enough praise.

The businessman, 38, who works in hair transplant services, was booted off after the billionaire show host branded him “disruptive and unpopular”.

Carlo found himself clashing with fellow contestant Max England, above right, who he accused of intentionally hindering his performance.

Their feud continued in the boardroom — with Lord Sugar less than impressed.

Speaking to The Sun, Carlo said: “I wish Lord Sugar could have given me a few tips. You don’t really get to interact with him at all.

“It would be nice if he could just come out and say, well done and shake hands.

“I get he’s a billionaire, he’s a busy guy, but me, personally, I would just say congratulations. That would have been nice.”

Read More »

Axed Apprentice star takes swipe at Lord Sugar after billionaire called them ‘disruptive’ & slams co-star amid show feud

AXED The Apprentice star Carlo Brancati has taken a swipe at Lord Sugar following his exit from the show.

The businessman, who specialises in hair transplant services, was booted by the billionaire after he branded him “disruptive and unpopular within the group”.

A man in a tan suit stands in front of a London cityscape at sunset.
BBC/Naked/Ray Burmiston
Axed The Apprentice star Carlo Brancati has spoken out after his early show exit[/caption]
Close-up of Carlo Brancati from The Apprentice 2025.
BBC
The star was given the boot after a furious feud with his co-star[/caption]
Lord Sugar with the Apprentice series 19 candidates.
BBC/Naked/Ray Burmiston/Rufina Breskin
Lord Sugar branded the candidate ‘disruptive’ before uttering ‘you’re fired’[/caption]

In tonight’s episode, Carlo, 38, found himself in an almighty clash with co-star Max who he accused of intentionally making him perform bad by restricting his participation in the show’s infamous task of finding nine different items and getting them for the best possible price.

Their furious feud also spilled out into the boardroom with Lord Sugar less than impressed with what he witnessed.

In the end, the mogul sided with Max and opted to give Carlo the boot but the candidate has now had his say on the business titan and what he hoped he’d have really been like.

Speaking exclusively to The Sun following his exit, Carlo remarked: “I wish Lord Sugar could have given me a few tips.

“You don’t really get to interact with him at all.

“It would be nice if he could just literally come out and say, well done and well done for getting on the show. Or say congratulations and shake hands.”

Carlo continued: “I get he’s a billionaire, he’s a busy guy and so maybe he just hasn’t got time. 

“But me personally, I would just say, you know, well done and congratulations.

“That would have been nice, but you can’t have everything how you want it.”

Before hearing the words “you’re fired” from the big man himself, Carlo’s final episode was largely dominated by his row with Max.

Ahead of dividing up the teams, Max was voted as “project manager” and chose to have Carlo on his team to “keep an eye on him”.

It meant he was ineligible to become the sub-team leader and was forced to do exactly as Max said.

It saw the pair clash a number of times with Max appearing to make it his mission to throw Carlo under the bus.

Taking aim at Max, Carlo told The Sun: “Max was strategic in the way he got me out. 

“You know, was I p***ed off about that? Well, you could say yes.”

He added that he predicted his downfall two days before his exit on one of the show’s down days.

Carlo added: “I could see how the event would unfold one or two days before. 

Two men in suits sitting at a table.
BBC
Carlo came under fire from his co-stars[/caption]

“I knew exactly how it was going. And it went the way I exactly  planned out.”

When asked if he and Max have squashed their beef and become friendly after the show, Carlo remained coy but insisted it was all “water under the bridge” and he held no grudges against anyone.

He said: “Ultimately, it’s all water under the bridge. A friend of mine said ‘do you dislike the people on the show’? And I said, ‘no, it’s kind of the opposite’. You’ve got to see beyond that.

“It’s all water under the bridge and it’s just the dynamics of the show.”

Speaking of his future, Carlo admitted he would continue on with his business, The Hair Transplant Specialist, with or without the help of Lord Sugar, confessing: “My business is irrelevant of Lord Sugar.

“What I mean by that is I’m not saying Lord Sugar is irrelevant. I’m saying I can’t put my eggs all in one basket to be like, if I don’t get Lord Sugar’s investment then this is not going to be a success.

“I’ve been doing my business for many years now. I’m a trusted advisor in the industry.

“People trust who I am.”

The Apprentice biggest moments

THE Apprentice has been a fan favourite ever since it burst onto the box in 2005.

Here we take a look at five of the biggest moments over the years on the hit BBC One show.

Tim Campbell – Former London Underground transport manager Tim Campbell won the first series of the reality show in 2005. He is now one of Lord Sugar’s aides on the show.

 Sarah Lynn and James White – For the first and only time in the show’s history, both finalists were crowned winners in 2017.

Amy Anzel – Season 16’s fired candidate Amy Anzel was BANNED from the final celebration show, after a tit-for-tat exchange over Lord Sugar’s mocking tweets.

Michelle Dewberry – Telecoms consultant Michelle Dewberry won the second series of the show in 2006. However, after winning a six-figure job with Lord Sugar she lasted just four months before she sensationally quit.

Selena Waterman-Smith – We’re used to tensions running high in the boardroom, but in 2015 a disagreement between two candidates spilled over – for the first time – into a physical bust-up. Events manager Selina Waterman-Smith was given a verbal warning by show bosses for her role in an off-camera scrap with Charleine Wain.

Read More »

Inside ‘Fat Con’ plus-size people celebrate their hot bodies, learn bondage & have pool parties at £958 for a VIP ticket

Collage of plus-size women swimming, posing in swimwear, and at a vendor table.

BODY-POSITIVE bonanza ‘Fat Con’ returned for the second time last month, seeing hundreds of plus-size Americans come together to celebrate their bodies.

Travelling to Seattle to take part in the festivities, attendees joined what organisers called “the biggest fat convention on the West Coast,” the Daily Mail reports.

Plus-size people enjoying a pool party.
Plus-size party-goers practised synchronised swimming
Instagram / @thefatcon
Group photo of plus-size people at a "Fat Con" event.
It was Fat Con’s second year bringing body positivity to Seattle
Instagram / @thefatcon

The super soirée had the aim of “improving the lives of fat humans through art, health, public policy and community outreach.”

Hundreds of guests turned up to get involved in a super-sized itinerary of exciting activities.

Ticket pricing began at £147, but stretched to a whopping £958 for VIP.

Splashing around at a colourful pool party while donning plus-size bikinis and trunks, happy guests pictures and videos online of the joyous gathering online.

In one clip, attendees can be seen trying out a synchronised swimming class – dancing together in the water in perfect unison.

And the event is also a hot spot for plus-size fashion, with generously-sized items of clothing on offer from sellers all over the nation.

Clothing brand Club Chub Clothing offered shirts emblazoned with loud and proud messages like “‘death to diet culture,’ ‘fat babes are hot,’ and ‘PCOS girly.'”

For the bolder body-positive “babes”, there was even an option to get to grips with some bondage lessons.

There, participants watched a Japanese bondage demonstration that saw experts suspended from dangling ropes.

Fat Con founder and non-binary burlesque performer, Mx. Pucks A’Plenty, told The Seattle Emerald: “This idea that a good body is a thin body is not true. You can be extremely healthy in a fat body and you can be radically unhealthy in a thin body and everything in between.”

Pucks A’Plenty also insisted that the body positivity movement needs to be re-centered around fat people, as in their opinion, it had become a “catch-all” for anyone.

They said that the idea of body positivity has become too attached to “white women doing yoga” and got “further and further away” from targeting the discrimination plus-size people receive.

And the diverse audience they’d gathered at Fat Con showed exactly how broad the spectrum of body positivity really is.

But despite the positive energy radiating from content shared online, it hasn’t all been smiles for Fat Con.

What is fatphobia?

Fatphobia, or fat shaming, is a term for the social stigma of obesity.

According to the University of York, fatphobia is “A fear or dislike of fat or people who are perceived to be overweight, often leading to harassment and discrimination of individuals and groups.”

Marketing Director of the event, Becky Wilson, told Komo News that last year the celebrations had caused backlash online, amid a culture that insists plus-size people should feel “shame” for existing in their bodies.

Well-known internet personalities like YouTuber Blaire White and The Daily Wire Matt Walsh were among the online trolls who mocked Fat Con, which Wilson said left them blocking and reporting each hateful comment.

And because of this, organisers were forced to up security measures this year to defend party-goers from negative trolls.

After a major success, Fat Con is set to return bigger and better than ever next year.

On January 16, 2026, the event will once again welcome back the plus-size community to Seattle.

Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme – Sun Club.

Read More »

Donald Trump’s peace plan must not undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty or reward Putin’s barbarity

Price of peace

GIVING Putin an inch in reward for his ­barbarity is repugnant.

But so is the idea of this terrible and apparently unwinnable war grinding on, claiming yet more innocent Ukrainian lives.

President Trump at a press conference.
President Trump’s peace efforts must include President Zelensky, whose leadership has earned Ukraine a seat at the table
Getty
Vladimir Putin seated at a desk.
AFP
Giving Vladimir Putin an inch of land in reward for his ­barbarity is repugnant[/caption]

Donald Trump is right to try to broker peace. But he cannot do so over President Zelensky’s head.

Ukraine’s monumental resistance and his courage and leadership have earned him the right to be a partner in the talks, even if surrendering territory now occupied by Russia looks grimly inevitable.

That said, what possible guarantee could anyone trust that Putin’s imperialist ambitions are satisfied?

With the US effectively withdrawing to focus on China, it has never been more urgent that Europe’s leaders including Keir Starmer snap out of their complacency on defence.

It is not good enough to promise to hit a slightly greater spending target at some distant point. A far higher one, at least three per cent of our GDP, must be set immediately.

Russia may be preparing for war with Nato. It’s time to rearm and recruit.

Skint Britain

LABOUR is currently failing in its central mission to make us richer. We are getting poorer, as new official figures show.

The economy grew just 0.1 per cent overall in the last quarter of 2024.

Measured per person, we’re in negative territory. And how could we not be?

Last October’s Budget hiked already crippling taxes and hammered business confidence, investment and jobs.

The unproductive public sector has meanwhile been vastly inflated.

Most of the £25billion extra found for the NHS was instantly swallowed by pay rises.

Our economy is stagnant, the Treasury skint and we will now need billions more for defence.

Rachel Reeves cannot raise taxes again. She must immediately find huge spending cuts. Start with foreign aid and welfare.

Kill this Bill

THE assisted dying Bill deserves to fail.

We take no side on the issue itself. But it seems abundantly clear that only those opposed to it are genuinely interested in forensically examining its arguments and ramifications.

The “for” lobby, led by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, appear driven by emotion, believing theirs is the side of “love”.

They dismiss considered, detailed objections as “noise”. The examining committee is stacked in their favour.

Now, having promised a High Court judge would oversee every case, they have removed even that vital safeguard.

Assisted dying may one day come about, via watertight Government legislation fully interrogated by Parliament.

This rushed, slapdash effort is not that.

 MPs must throw it out.

Read More »

‘Man Utd the problem’ say fans as £85.5m flop Antony scores stunning goal for Real Betis in Conference League clash

ANTONY continued his fine Real Betis form by scoring against Gent in the Europa Conference League.

The Manchester United flop, 24, joined the Spanish side on loan in January having struggled for game time at Old Trafford.

https://twitter.com/footballontnt/status/1890148121759428881
Soccer game in progress.
Antony launched a shot from the edge of the box
Antony of Real Betis celebrating a goal.
Rex
The Brazilian celebrates his second goal in two games[/caption]

The Brazilian found the net in just his second Betis appearance against Celta Vigo last weekend, having laid on an assist on his debut.

He continued his resurgence by scoring a fine effort to give his loan side the lead in Belgium this evening.

Barely a minute into the second half, the winger received the ball on the right flank.

He subsequently drove inside, before unleashing a shot into the bottom corner.

Fans online were quick to have their say on Antony‘s goal.

One posted: “United was the problem.”

While a second blasted: “Now it is clear that United destroys every player.”

A third wrote: “Crazy what confidence can do to a player.”

BEST FREE BETS AND BETTING SIGN UP OFFERS

Real Betis player Antony celebrates, a message written on his shirt.
EPA
Antony reveals a message on his undershirt[/caption]

And another added: “Prime Antony is back.”

Real Betis CEO Ramon Alcaron has already admitted that his side are interested in making Antony’s loan deal permanent.

The former Ajax star remains under contract at United until June 2027.

Asked about whether he wants to keep Antony long-term, Alcaron said: “Yes, I think so. The other day the CEO of United called me.

“We sent them details of the player throughout the week so they can see we’re looking after their asset.

“We have very good chemistry with United and the player, who is happy here.

“It is a possibility that he will continue next season, why not?”

Antony joined Man Utd in an £86million deal in the summer of 2022; subsequently scoring 12 goals and laying on five assists in 96 appearances.

Antony of Manchester United looking dejected on the field.
Getty
Antony struggled to perform at Man Utd[/caption]

Read More »

‘Essex Boys’ killer Michael Steele to be released from prison in WEEKS after 27 years behind bars over triple killing

ESSEX Boys triple killer Michael ‘Angel of Death’ Steele is set to be released from prison within weeks.

The 81-year-old, convicted of murdering three drug dealers found shot dead inside a Range Rover in 1995 on an isolated farm track at Rettendon, near Basildon, has been granted parole.

Mugshots of Patrick Tate, Anthony Tucker, and Craig Rolfe.
PA
Steele was jailed for life for the killings of Patrick Tate (left), Anthony Tucker (centre), and Craig Rolfe (Right)[/caption]
Police officers examining a Range Rover in the snow.
Andrew Styczynski - The Sun
Police examining the Range Rover on the farm track at Rettendon in December 1995[/caption]

Steele has always maintained his innocence over the murders which spawned a series of gangster films.

A Parole Board panel has ruled that Steele is fit for release and will not be a danger to the public.

The panel’s summary said: ‘’His behaviour in prison had shown a marked improvement and Mr Steele had been engaging more closely with those supervising him.

“None of the witnesses considered that his risks would be imminent if Mr Steele was released….”

Steele will be subject to strict limitations on the outside including a designated accommodation and restrictions on his contacts.

He must also “be of good behaviour”, disclose financial details and any business-related matters, surrender his passport, and to report as required for supervision or other appointments.

Steele will also be subject to an enhanced form of supervision or monitoring including signing-in times, electronic tagging and a specified curfew.

There will be limitations concerning named contacts, his activities and residency, and exclusion conditions to avoid contact with victims and prevent access to firearms.

He must also meet specified restrictions relating to the use of electronic technology and contact with the media or other publications and not to own a boat, airplane or firearm.

Drug dealers Pat Tate, 37, Tony Tucker, 38, who acted as security for boxer Nigel Benn, and Craig Rolfe, 26, were found dead by farmers in the vehicle on the morning of December 7, 1995.

It is believed they were blasted with shotguns by Steele and Jack Whomes, 63, the night before in a row over a drugs deal.

The discovery of the gangster’s bodies was less than three weeks after the death of Leah Betts, 18, who took an ecstasy pill from a bad batch believed to have been supplied by the three victims, sparking national outrage.

An image of her laying in intensive care was released by her policeman father Paul Betts as a deterrent to other youngsters.

The shocking gangland murders spawned a series of gangster flicks started by the 2000 film Essex Boys, which starred Sean Bean, and the Rise of the Footsoldier movies.

PROCLAMATIONS OF INNOCENCE

Steele and Whomes were convicted in 1998 of the grisly murders, but have always protested their innocence.

They were given life with a minimum term of 23 years after being found guilty at the Old Bailey.

Whomes was released in early 2021 and has given no media interviews to protest his innocence, down to strict licence conditions which prevent this, according to supporters.

Although the Ministry of Justice refused to confirm this was a condition of his licence.

Steele’s parole hearing in November was previously adjourned for further information after Steele made corruption allegations against Essex Police during earlier parole reviews.

The pair have previously failed to overturn their convictions at the Court of Appeal and in 2023 the Criminal Case Review Commission (CCRC) rejected an application from their lawyers to refer their convictions back to the Court of Appeal.

The application was based on information in a leaked secret Met Police anti-corruption report that detailed how an organised crime boss was secretly recorded on police tape, on the day Leah died on November 16 1995, offering to arrange the murders of the suppliers of the drug that killed her.

The proposal was made to a retired detective suspected of having a corrupt relationship with the crime lord, who was secretly being bugged.

Details of the recording were never disclosed to the defence during the trial of Whomes and Steele, but after looking into the non-disclosure for six years, the CCRC concluded it was not enough to provoke a retrial.

A new application to the CCRC is currently under review after a team of former detectives submitted a dossier of evidence they claim casts doubt on the prosecutions.

In a rare step, the CCRC has accepted submissions from a third party other than the defence, before agreeing to carry out the fresh review of the convictions.

A CCRC spokesperson said: “Applications have been received in relation to these individuals, and a review is currently underway.

“It would be inappropriate for us to make any further comment while the applications are under review.”

It is understood that the review follows the submission of a dossier of evidence from the team of former Met Police murder detectives who spent about three years reviewing the case before becoming convinced Steele and Whomes are innocent.

Whomes and Steele were convicted largely on the evidence of supergrass Darren Nicholls, 59, who claimed to be their getaway driver and is now under witness protection.

He agreed to give evidence after being arrested in May 1996 on suspicion of being involved in a cannabis importation.

Headshot of Michael Steele.
PA
Michael Steele is set to be released on licence in the coming weeks[/caption]

Read More »

Hungry stag party revellers on 121-mile train trip have 15 pizzas delivered during 90-second stop-off

A STAG party got Domino’s pizzas delivered — to their train during a 121-mile trip.

Staff were seen loading 15 boxes aboard from the platform during a 90-second stop-off.

Groom on a stag do eating Domino's pizza on a train.
Supplied
Andrew Grant was surprised on his stag do when his friends had Dominos delivered to the train[/caption]
Domino's pizza delivery to a train.
Dominos staff were seen loading 15 boxes aboard from the platform during a 90-second stop-off
@Granty_10/X
Domino's pizza delivery on a train.
@Granty_10/X
The boys over-ordered, so shared some boxes with fellow passengers[/caption]

David Grant, 41, spent weeks planning the stunt for groom-to-be brother Andrew, 30, and his pals.

The best man told The Sun everything needed to be perfectly timed on the three-hour Glasgow to Aberdeen train last Saturday.

He said: “The idea came into my head because of how long the train journey was.

“We were meeting in the pub to discuss the stag and realised we didn’t get to Aberdeen until 4.30pm.”

He said various delivery points were considered, before plumping for Montrose as that was the only station with no barriers, making it easier for staff to get on the platform.

David, of Glasgow, went on: “I called the Montrose branch three weeks before, put an order in, and they were brilliant and really accommodating.

“It was like a military operation at both ends.”

On the day, David was fretting about timings before they pulled in to Montrose, where Domino’s staff were waiting with their £152 order.

Video footage shows eight margaritas and seven pepperoni pizzas delivered from the platform to the group.

However they over-ordered, so shared some with fellow passengers, before a night out in Aberdeen involving “too many pints” with Andrew, who gets wed next month.

Montrose store manager Courtney Ford said: “Delivering pizza to a moving train for a stag do is definitely one of the most unique delivery experiences we’ve had.

“Coordinating with the train schedule added a layer of excitement and pressure but nothing that Domino’s Montrose couldn’t rise to.”

A similar train stunt was made in 2020 by Scot singer Lewis Capaldi, who had two Domino’s pepperoni pizzas dropped off at Darlington.

Capaldi, 28, ordered it because the buffet car was shut for the Edinburgh to London service.

A man in a light blue jacket makes a "gun" gesture with his hands.
Lewis Capaldi had two Domino’s pepperoni pizzas dropped off at Darlington station

Read More »

Love Island All Stars in ‘fix’ row as fans insist producers are ‘forcing’ conversations amid explosive feud

LOVE Island All Stars fans called out a ‘fix’ row and insisted producers are ‘forcing’ conversations amid an explosive feud.

Viewers have seen islanders Ekin-Su and Elma Pazar spend a tense few days feuding.

Elma Pazar on Love Island.
Rex
Elma and Ekin-Su sat down for a chat[/caption]
Elma Pazar on Love Island.
Elma addressed rising tensions between the pair
Eroteme
Ekin-Su Culculoglu on Love Island: All Stars.
Rex
Ekin-Su listened to what her rival had to say[/caption]

In tonight’s episode, the two sat down for a conversation to address the situation.

Elma began by saying: “I felt we both got a lot off our chests yesterday. Maybe it was needed, in a roundabout way.”

Continuing, she added: “I just want clear up… because I feel like you really think I’ve got this vendetta against you.

And in all honesty, it’s never about you. The Sammy kiss obviously was an issue. I don’t understand where all of that anger really came from.

“I get that you were sticking up for Curtis. I personally find Curtis very jarring. That is just my opinion. You, I do not.”

Some fans weren’t convinced the moment was authentic – and shared their thoughts online.

One person wrote: “oh the producers MADE her go have that convo #loveislandallstars.”

Another added: “producers obviously forced this ekin and elma chat #loveisland #loveislandallstars.”

While a third penned: “lmaooo the producers definitely forced aunty Elma to talk to Ekin no ways that raging volcano would come speak willingly to her #LoveIslandAllStars #LoveIsland.”

A fourth remarked: “Oooohh.. The Love Island producers have stepped in and told Elma about the backlash, hence the “apology.”

“Not interested #LoveIslandAllStars”

Their fall-out began during the heart rate challenge after Ekin-Su decided to give Sammy Root – who is coupled up with Elma – a peck on the lips as she worked to get his pulse racing. 

It came after the past winner promised Elma that she wouldn’t snog her man.

Fuming, Elma made it clear afterwards that she was not a fan of Ekin-Su.

Last week the Islanders played a game of Snog, Marry, Pie – with Sammy, 23, choosing to rub a pie in Ekin-Su’s face due to the controversial kiss. 

Love Island All Stars 2025 official line-up

Love Island All Stars is back on TV for season 2.

Here we take you through the line-up of all the Islanders who are in the villa so far.

Bombshells

Each series brings with it a string of hot single bombshells making their epic entrance into the villa.

Here’s who has joined the villa so far:

After seeing Ekin-Su upset, however, Sammy decided to apologise – leaving Elma reeling.

She insisted he shouldn’t have apologised and instead needed to “stand on business”.

How will the pair’s dynamic unfold from here?

Love Island continues on ITV2 and ITVX.

Love Island All Stars contestants at a dinner party.
ITV
All Stars sees past islanders return to the villa for another shot at love[/caption]

Read More »

‘Never an easy decision.. I’m sorry’ – Ronnie O’Sullivan breaks silence on latest tournament withdrawal in health update

RONNIE O’SULLIVAN has apologised to fans following his latest withdrawal.

The Rocket, 49, had been set to be in action at the Welsh Open this week.

Ronnie O'Sullivan at a snooker semifinal match.
Getty
Ronnie O’Sullivan withdrew from the Welsh Open earlier this week[/caption]

O’Sullivan was due to face local hero Jamie Clarke in Llandudno.

But just hours before the scheduled contest, the seven-time world champion pulled out.

His withdrawal followed absences at the Shoot Out, Scottish Open, Masters and German Masters.

Referencing his recent withdrawals, four-time Welsh Open champion O’Sullivan wrote on X: “I realise plenty of people who bought tickets to some recent snooker events will have been frustrated when I withdrew.

“So I just wanted to say sorry to those of you who’ve been disappointed with me having to pull out of those tournaments.

“I’ve been trying to prioritise my health and well-being, which sometimes means making last-minute decisions not to play.

“It’s never an easy decision and I hate letting people down.

“I’m doing what I can to get back to my best, and I’m grateful for all your support and understanding.”

BEST FREE BETS AND BETTING SIGN UP OFFERS

Jamie Clarke chalking his cue at a snooker match.
Getty
Jamie Clarke had been due to take on O’Sullivan[/caption]

O’Sullivan hasn’t played since snapping his cue during a frustrating Championship League campaign on January 9.

The Rocket apologised to opponent Robert Milkins and the ref after twice rapping his cue against the table during the Group 3 match.

Clarke, 30, had been excited to face O’Sullivan in Llandudno.

Following the Rocket’s withdrawal, Clarke said: “Yeah, I was relishing playing him.

“There was 20 per cent a little bit disappointment when I got the phonecall this morning.

“Because he’s coming towards the end of his career. You don’t get many chances to play Ronnie.

“He picks and chooses his events and rightly so. I was probably more happy than not happy, but it would have been nice to play him.”

O’Sullivan has already pulled out of six ranking tournaments so far this season.

He is next expected to be in action later this month at the World Open in Yushan, China.

The event is schedule to commence on February 23.

Read More »